Fiducia Supplicans

One year after his election, Pope Leo XIV remains widely respected and personally popular, yet many of the deepest crises inherited from Francis remain unsettled Greeting the eager eyes of the world for the very first time one year ago, Leo XIV laid out his papal style by citing his spiritual father, St Augustine. Twelve months later, the Church he inherited remains largely just as troubled, and though Leo himself is beloved by many, he is yet to deliver notable resolutions to the various conflicts in the manner that was predicted of him. Emerging onto the Loggia in the early evening of May 8, 2025, Leo XIV presented a genial figure and, bedecked in the traditional mozzetta and stole rejected by Pope Francis, was greeted warmly. For all the rhetoric about necessary change proposed by ardent papal apologists during the Francis era, Leo’s use of traditional papal attire made an instant and undeniable positive impression on the crowd. In assessing his first year as pope, it is clear that those who immediately sought to portray him as a reborn St Pius X or an ardent champion of the most heterodox causes have both been confounded. Francis’ reign led to continuous spicy headlines, and his off-the-cuff remarks brushed aside centuries of Tradition in favour of the Argentine’s personal theology. Leo is not as easy to pin down: he is neither revolutionary nor a “rigid” traditionalist. If a label is needed, Leo appears to resemble John Paul II more than his other two immediate predecessors, for both better and worse: charismatic in character, quietly and confidently rooted in his own persona, conservative to a certain extent in liturgy and reverent, but not ardently traditional, orthodox in morality, but sometimes seemingly blind to pressing issues, or simply reluctant to act. For those to whom the latter part of such an assessment seems too critical, one must not forget that a number of pressing scandals and personal appointments remain unaddressed. True, Leo’s style does not appear oriented towards instant action, nor towards breaking the laws of diplomatic courtesy. That can indeed be a positive trait – especially after a pontificate of such turmoil, but in some cases, such as the immense scandal and ecclesial devastation caused by the Francis-era appointment of Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández, urgent action is not just appropriate but necessary. So what are the most controversial issues Leo has inherited? There is, of course, the infamous Sino-Vatican deal, but given that it is not due for renewal until 2028, Leo will likely feel less pressure over it. So far, though, the Leonine Vatican has continued the previous style of appeasement towards Beijing, seemingly allowing China to pull the strings. This is in large part due to Cardinal Pietro Parolin remaining as Secretary of State. Amoris Laetitia and the scandal of allowing the divorced and “re-married” to receive Communion remain as grave a crisis as when the document was signed by Francis in 2016. Leo has convened a meeting of bishops to discuss the matter in October, and it is the opinion of this correspondent that, at that event or shortly afterwards, the American pope might overturn this element of Francis’ text, albeit in a veiled manner. Should he fail to do so, however, it will likely be seen as one of the most egregious moments of his pontificate. Fiducia Supplicans also remains in force, although Leo appears to have undermined the ill-fated text in recent weeks when he stated that “the Holy See has made it clear that we do not agree with the formalized blessing of couples, in this case homosexual couples, as you asked, or couples in irregular situations, beyond what was specifically, if you will, allowed for by Pope Francis in saying all people receive blessings.” Debate has raged over this line, as to whether Leo was supporting FS or rejecting it, but there is no doubt that the text calls for the blessing of couples and that, by prohibiting such blessings, Leo has softly closed the door. Herein lies the essence of much of Leo’s style. His is a gentle, diplomatic approach, and one much needed. Leo is never going to be the pope who formally overturns the actions of an immediate predecessor, unlike Francis. Rather, he favours re-presenting Catholic teaching anew, quoting just enough of Francis to show continuity in the papal line before then diverging from Francis in content in favour of the Church’s tradition. On more than one occasion, Leo has employed a trademark phrase of Francis’, used by the Argentine to cloud Church teaching, before adding his own twist in order to clarify the matter at hand. He is a man of purpose and of listening. Also evident from his speeches and homilies is the extent of his personal learning and active spirituality. Commenting at the time of his election, many cardinals praised his ability to build bridges between warring parties and satisfy everyone. So far, Leo has certainly attempted to do just that. On the issue of the traditional Mass, another problem inherited from Francis, he made waves by allowing Cardinal Raymond Burke to offer a high-profile Mass for the annual Latin Mass pilgrimage to the Vatican. It was an event laden with significance, and Leo even endured criticism for it from within the Curia. He believed strongly enough in the importance of allowing the event to proceed that he was willing to endure the grumblings of others. But at a certain point, the papacy will force him to act in a way that being a diocesan bishop and Curial prefect did not, namely to decide in such a way as to leave only one side happy. As pope, he has stated that his ministry “is distinguished precisely by this self-sacrificing love, because the Church of Rome presides in charity and its true authority is the charity of Christ.” Leo appears to be a man keen to honour truth, law and basic justice in a way that could not always be said of Francis. He is committed to a fairly permissive degree of listening to differing views and then acting with an informed mind. However, in order to preserve unity based on Christ, Leo will eventually have to leave the heterodox ecclesial lobby unhappy, and whether or not he has the strength to do so will determine the efficacy of his papacy.

Cardinal Reinhard Marx has instructed clergy in Munich to offer blessings to couples in irregular unions, including same-sex couples, under new diocesan guidelines based on Fiducia Supplicans Cardinal Reinhard Marx has instructed priests in Munich to offer blessings to couples in irregular unions, including same-sex couples and those who are divorced and civilly remarried. Cardinal Reinhard Marx has instructed priests in Munich to offer blessings to couples in irregular unions, including same-sex couples and those who are divorced and civilly remarried. According to guidance confirmed this week by the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising, all pastoral practice is to follow the guidelines Segen gibt der Liebe Kraft (“Blessing Gives Love Strength”), adopted last year by the Joint Conference of the German Bishops’ Conference and the Central Committee of German Catholics (ZdK), and now set to become a fundamental element of pastoral work across the archdiocese. In a letter to clergy and pastoral staff, Cardinal Marx wrote: “To all couples who love each other and seek a blessing from the Church for their partnership, I wish that they may feel God’s grace in this blessing.” The letter, confirmed by diocesan officials, sets out that “no couple should be turned away” if they request such a blessing. The archdiocese has also announced that training sessions for pastoral workers on how to conduct these blessing ceremonies will begin in June, in line with the new guidelines. These sessions are intended to standardise the practice across parishes and ensure that clergy and lay workers are prepared to implement the policy. Clergy who do not wish to perform such blessings themselves are not permitted simply to refuse. Instead, they are expected to refer couples to their dean or to another member of pastoral staff who is willing to carry out the ceremony. The directive is intended to ensure that access to blessings is not dependent on the personal views of individual priests. Cardinal Marx also addressed anticipated resistance, asking that the “theological meaning” of the blessings be explained to those who “still struggle with this blessing”. The guidance emphasises that the practice is to be understood within a broader pastoral framework rather than as a change to sacramental teaching. The document makes clear that such blessings are not equivalent to marriage. However, it adds that this distinction should not result in exclusion. “This does not mean that the blessing of a non-sacramental union, which in many cases is already a civil marriage, pushes the couple to the margins of the community and the Church,” the text states. It continues: “Couples should be welcomed in the heart of the community. Therefore, the Church asks God to bless and grant good things to these couples.” The guidelines also suggest that, “where necessary”, such blessings may serve as “a contribution to healing and reconciliation”. The blessing text was developed under Pope Francis’s declaration Fiducia Supplicans in December 2023, which permitted non-liturgical blessings of couples in irregular situations under certain conditions. According to the document, the guidelines are intended as an offer to “divorced and remarried individuals, couples of all gender identities and sexual orientations, as well as couples who, for other reasons, do not wish or cannot receive the sacrament of marriage”. At the time of their presentation, they were described as following “the pastoral approach of the pontificate of Pope Francis”. However, several dioceses, including Augsburg, Eichstätt, Cologne, Passau and Regensburg, have indicated that they do not use the guidelines. Blessings for same-sex couples are already a common practice in several German dioceses, and the Munich directive is expected to set a broader trend within the country’s Church structures. The introduction of formal guidelines indicates a move towards greater consistency in how such blessings are carried out.