Immigration Policy

Bishop Barron warns against ‘demonisation’ of Trump over immigration

Bishop Barron warns against ‘demonisation’ of Trump over immigration

Bishop Robert Barron has warned Catholics against the “demonisation” of Donald Trump’s administration over immigration policy and said that support for border enforcement can arise from “very good moral reasons” Bishop Robert Barron has called on Catholics to resist the “demonisation” of President Donald Trump’s administration over immigration policy. The Bishop of Winona-Rochester made the remarks during an interview with Fox News Digital in which he urged greater dialogue between Catholics of differing political convictions and warned against reducing the immigration debate to partisan caricatures. Bishop Barron, perhaps the most recognisable Catholic from the United States after the Pope, said that conservatives who support tighter immigration controls should not automatically be dismissed as lacking compassion. “I don’t think it’s fair to say to a conservative, to a Republican, you’re just being difficult and anti-humanitarian,” Bishop Barron said, while arguing that the Church should instead encourage “bridges of conversation”. His Grace suggested that some Catholics on the political left had failed to extend to conservatives the same spirit of dialogue they often advocate elsewhere in public life. “At times, the Catholic left is great for calling for dialogue and bridge-building, until it comes to conservatives,” Bishop Barron said. “When it comes to conservatives, just tell them what they should be doing and saying.” The bishop continued: “No, no, let’s build bridges of conversation. That’s a role the Church can play. What I don’t want from the Church is a kind of demonisation of the Trump administration.” Bishop Barron said disagreements over immigration policy, or other contentious issues such as the recent conflict involving Iran, should be approached through serious discussion rather than ideological condemnation. “If there are points of disagreement, whether it’s immigration or it’s the [Iran] war or whatever, let’s talk about it, let’s talk,” His Grace said, while acknowledging that efforts to foster those conversations within ecclesial circles had “not always met with success”. The bishop also revealed that he had recently been moved by comments from Tom Homan, the former acting director of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and President Trump’s so-called “border czar”, during a White House call connected to the president’s Religious Liberty Commission, on which Bishop Barron serves. According to Bishop Barron, Homan spoke emotionally about the human consequences of weak border enforcement and particularly about trafficking networks exploiting children. “He said that because he’s seen the terrible destruction caused by an open border,” Bishop Barron explained. “He was talking especially about human trafficking, the human trafficking of children, the disappearance of children we’ve lost track of completely in this process.” The bishop said Homan had rejected what he described as “the simplistic view that an open border is humanitarian”. “An open border also produces enormous moral problems,” Bishop Barron said, adding that Homan’s concern appeared deeply personal and sincere. “You could tell that it was affecting him very deeply, very personally. I found that very moving.” His Grace argued that support for immigration enforcement should not simply be interpreted through a partisan lens, but could arise from genuine moral concern. “It’s not just, well, the bad guy, Republicans, who want to enforce immigration laws,” Bishop Barron said. “It’s Republicans for very good moral reasons who want to enforce immigration law.” At the same time, the bishop stressed that the immigration debate contains “values on both sides” and suggested that the Church could help facilitate a more serious exchange between political leaders and Catholic moral teaching. Bishop Barron referred to tensions between President Trump and Pope Leo XIV, saying that part of the difficulty stemmed from attempts to treat the Holy Father as though he were merely another political figure. “Popes, I think, are supposed to use the moral structure of the Church’s teaching to move prudential judgement in the right direction,” Bishop Barron said. “Now what’s a president’s responsibility? His responsibility is to make those prudential judgements.” The bishop suggested that prominent Catholics within the Trump administration, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the US ambassador to the Holy See, Brian Burch, should engage directly with Vatican officials in order to foster more constructive discussion. “The Church provides a moral framework. Terrific,” Bishop Barron said. “Now, let’s have a real conversation with those whose job it is to make that decision, but have it conditioned by this moral framework. That would be more fruitful.” The remarks come amid continuing divisions among American Catholics over immigration policy and the proper balance between national sovereignty and humanitarian obligations towards migrants and refugees. The US bishops’ conference has frequently criticised aspects of the Trump administration’s immigration policies in recent years, particularly mass deportation proposals and restrictions on asylum claims, while conservative Catholics have increasingly argued that border enforcement and opposition to human trafficking are themselves matters of Catholic social concern. The debate has become one of the defining fault lines in American Catholic life, particularly following the rise of populist politics in the United States and Europe, with bishops and theologians often divided over how Catholic teaching on solidarity, the dignity of migrants and the responsibilities of the state should be applied in practice. Bishop Barron’s comments suggest he believes the Church’s role is not to align itself unquestioningly with either political camp, but to insist upon serious moral engagement between them.

Niwa Limbu

May 27, 2026